THE COUNTESS'S TRAVAILS
See Also: COAL Coal
Wealth; TOWNHOUSES,
DISAPPEARED; MENU
George
Bowes inherited estates in County Durham and Northumberland. The latter were located above mineable seams
of coal. The gentleman proved to be a
gifted entrepreneur. First, he improved
the efficiency of his own mines and then, in 1726, he and three other
landowners in the region formed the Grand Allies cartel. This was a 99-year-long agreement under which
they effectively pooled their coal-related resources. It enabled them to undertake large projects
that were to their mutual advantage, such as the construction of a bridge that
made it far easier for them to send their coal to Newcastle Upon Tyne s
wharves. In 1727 Bowes was elected to
serve as an M.P.. He used his membership
of the Commons to promote the interests of the North-East and its coal
industry.
Bowes s
only child was his daughter Mary. Upon
her father's death in 1760 she became one of the era's greatest heiresses. She had a strong natural intelligence that
had been developed through a high-quality education. Her particular interests included botany,
languages, and literature. Her widowed
mother took No. 40 Grosvenor Square as a townhouse.
In
1767, at the age of eighteen, Mary fell for the 9th Earl of
Strathmore, a handsome Scottish peer. He
was a decade older than she was. By the
time of their wedding, she had come to appreciate that they had nothing in
common. However, her pride prompted her
to go ahead with the nuptials. The
marriage produced three sons and two daughters.
She preferred the latter over the former and felt virtually nothing in
the way of maternal affection for her eldest child Lord Lyon.
The
countess sought to participate in London's cultural and intellectual life. Her husband barred her from becoming a member
of Elizabeth Montagu's blue-stocking salon.
However, he was content for her to engage in a wide range of other
pursuits. These included writing a play;
one of its themes was unrequited love.
He used some of her wealth to restore Glamis Castle, his ancestral seat
near Dundee.
The
flawed marriage deteriorated. The
countess became infatuated with a man who was several years her junior. She refrained from acting carnally. The fellow joined the Army and their mutual
ardour cooled. The earl contracted
tuberculosis. He and his wife took to
spending increasing amounts of time apart from one another. She established her own salon. Its meetings were held in the family s
Grosvenor Square mansion.
Those
who attended this assembly included George Gray, a former East India Company
official. While he had been in his
employers service, he had earned a reputation for being corrupt. When, in 1765, Robert Clive had gone out to
the subcontinent to cleanse the Company's Augean stable there, Gray had
resigned from his position and returned to Britain. His pursuit of the countess was almost certainly
mercenary in character.1 He
and she became lovers. They had trysts
at her townhouse. He was admitted to the
building surreptitiously by George Walker, a footman in whom she placed
particular trust.
In 1776
Strathmore died. He had been very close
to his younger brother Thomas Lyon.
During the marriage, it had been the latter who had managed of the Bowes
estates and coal interests. He and his
sister-in-law had never developed a good relationship with one another. Following the 9th earl's death his
widow regained control of her fortune.
She threw herself into a life of pleasure. In the process, she neglected her children.
At the
time of the peer's demise, the countess was pregnant by Gray. She secured an abortion. Rumours of the relationship were current in
society. A further two pregnancies were
terminated.
Andrew
Robinson Stoney was the eldest son of an Irish gentleman. He had not been content with his comfortable
prospects. He had joined the British
Army in order to broaden his opportunities.
While he had been billeted in Newcastle Upon Tyne he had wooed and wed
Hannah Newton, the heiress to a modest County Durham estate. At that time, a woman's property became her
husband's upon their marriage unless a trust had been established to keep it
out of his possession. No such provision
had been made, therefore, her life interest in her late father's estate had
become Stoney s. He had retired from the
Army. His actions had soon revealed that
he was a violent sociopath. He had
terrorised his wife in order to make her submissive to his will. In 1776 she had died during childbirth. The infant had done likewise. Stoney inherited several thousand
pounds. He moved to London and took
lodgings above the St James's Coffee House. However, his spendthrift nature led to his
depleting his capital at a fast rate.
Through
having lived in the North-East, Stoney was aware of the Bowes fortune. He set out to acquire control of it by
marrying the widowed Lady Strathmore. An
army friend of his was an attendee of her salons. This connection enabled the adventurer to
meet her and to start to exert his charms upon her. For her part, the countess soon found herself
to be attracted to her new suitor. She
heard rumours that he had mistreated his late wife. She chose to regard them as being the
products of provincial jealousies and so discounted them.
Mary
became pregnant by Gray again. She
concluded that she would marry him. This
decision was reached after considerable equivocation since she had relished her
independence. However, she and Stoney
became lovers. The Morning Post
newspaper was edited by the controversial clergyman the Rev Henry Bate. The journal started to publish a series of
disparaging stories about the countess's conduct. The adventurer declared that he would defend
her honour. The two men met one another
in an encounter that took place in a locked room at The Adelphi Tavern. The countess heard a report that her champion
had been gravely wounded. Three
physicians tended to him. They stated
that the man would soon die from his lacerations.
The
duellist declared that he wished to expire as the countess's husband. She agreed to comply with his wish. A special licence was secured from the Bishop
of London. After she had spent a final
night with Gray, she and Stoney married one another in St James's Church
Piccadilly on 17 January 1777. Within a
week he had made a full recovery .
Subsequently, it was to emerge that during the previous summer he and
the Rev Bate had come to know one another while they had both been Taking the
waters at Bath. Of the three verifying
physicians, two had been in the adventurer's pay, while the third Independent
one, who had had the most distinguished reputation, was elderly and had not
actually examined the supposed wounds.
He had, taken Stoney's pallor, which had been induced by the application
of leaches, to be sufficient evidence of the man's dire plight.
In
order to comply with the conditions that had been set out in the will of George
Bowes, Stoney changed his own surname to Bowes.
As with his first marriage, he soon revealed his true character. He took control of every facet of Mary's life
and sought to make her compliant to his will by means of physical and mental
abuse. She realised that she had been
tricked. Tales of Lady Strathmore s
plight started to circulate in society.
However, the haughtiness that she had displayed during her widowhood
stymied any expressions of sympathy that might otherwise have been voiced.
The
countess was not the only spouse who was subjected to revelations. Bowes learned both that, while her property
was vast, she had developed large debts that required paying down and that she
was pregnant by Gray. In addition, he
discovered that, a week before their wedding, she had, in view of her
prospective marriage to the unborn infant's father, signed a pre-nuptial
settlement. This document had
safeguarded the lion's share of her inheritance for her children by her first
husband. The fortune-hunter came to
believe that it was he who had been the victim of a plot.
Bowes
dealt with the issue of the pregnancy by renting a riverside property that was
located near to Fulham. The countess
gave birth to a daughter who was also given the name of Mary. To make the child appear to be Bowes's the
parturition was kept secret. The couple
then travelled with the infant to Gibside Hall, the Boweses principal seat in
County Durham. There, they resided for a
couple of months before announcing the child's arrival. (Snide comments were made in society about
the confinement having been a particularly long one.)
Thomas
Lyon concluded that the time had come for him to protect the interests of his
nieces and nephews. He launched an
action in the Court of Chancery to enable him to assume control of the
direction of their lives. The suit was
successful. Lyon then barred Mary from
seeing her five eldest children.
Bowes s
aggressions had warped the countess's worldview. She attributed the beatings to her own
supposed failings. Almost a year after
their marriage, he succeeded in compelling her to put her name to a document
that sought to revoke her pre-nuptial settlement. Her signature gave Bowes control of her
inheritance. One of the first things
that he did was to make a generous payment to Gray, who otherwise would have
been free to seek legal redress for Mary's failure to marry him.
In 1782
Mary gave birth to a son. He was Bowes s
child and was given the name William.
Soon after the marriage had started it had become apparent that the
adventurer had no intention of being faithful to his wife. Sometimes he preyed upon female members of
the household. Poor, working women had a
basic appeal to him because he could awe them.
However, beyond this, they also had a distinct allure for him. Following the birth this strand in his
personality became more pronounced.
Bowes
had social ambitions. He wished to be
made an Irish peer.2 In 1780
he used Mary's family wealth and influence to help secure his election as one
of the M.P.s for Newcastle Upon Tyne.
For all his social skills in the demi-monde and his abilities to
manipulate the I, he was a poor politician.
He alienated his electors and proved to be unable to develop any
political standing at Westminster. Four
years later he lost the seat.
Thereafter, he became even more antagonistic towards the countess, he
took to threatening her with blades. She
was aware that he had sought to safeguard his own financial well-being by
taking out a number of insurance policies upon her life.
The
adventurer maintained his control over the household both by dismissing anyone
whom he suspected might not be awed by him and by hiring as servants people who
would be biddable. He sought to engage a
maid for Mary but found himself to be unable to find anyone whom he felt was as
compliant as he wished. Eventually, he
delegated the task to his chaplain. The
latter engaged upon his employer's behalf a widow called Mary Morgan.
Mrs
Morgan was only slightly younger than her mistress. She was intelligent, educated, and
righteous. Her duties exposed her to the
countess's bruises and injuries. When
she asked Mary about these, she was answered with prevarications. Bowes's violence became more marked. This prompted the countess to tell Morgan the
truth. The maid determined to aid Lady
Strathmore in any way that she could.
Over a period, she succeeded in identifying three like-minded women
amongst the townhouse's staff.
Bowes
made a second mistake with regard to servants.
Soon after his marriage to Mary he had sacked George Walker. However, the adventurer had an on-going
lawsuit against Thomas Lyon. He did not
wish to run the risk that Lyon might have the footman subpoenaed as a
witness. Therefore, for a period the
former employee was secreted in the townhouse.
Mary was able to talk with him privately. Following her signing of the pre-nuptial
document in 1777 she had given a copy of it to him for safekeeping. She asked him whether he still possessed
it. He replied that he did. She realised that there was the possibility
of cancelling the revocation and reinstating the original settlement. She was also aware that it was probably only
a matter of time before Bowes dismissed Morgan from their service. Therefore, she decided to act. She asked the maid to help her to escape from
her husband.
On 3
February 1785, Bowes went out for the evening.
Morgan's allies in the household created a number of noisy
incidents. In the commotion that these
engendered the maid and her mistress slipped out of the mansion. They took up residence at No. 2 Dyers
Buildings in Holborn. The other three
servants who were loyal to her ladyship joined them there. Bowes, upon learning of what had happened,
tried to find where his wife and her associates had disappeared to. He was unable to do so. He still had physical possession of her two
youngest children Mary and William.
The
countess, in her newly regained freedom, recovered her self-assurance. She had no financial resources and was
dependent upon well-wishers for her day-to-day sustenance. However, the
possibility that she would regain control of her vast inheritance enabled her
to induce a solicitor to work on her behalf until such time as she could afford
to pay him. She launched three parallel
lawsuits. One was started in the London
Consistory Court to annul her marriage to Bowes; a second one in the Court of
the King's Bench to try to bind the adventurer to keep the peace; and a third
in the Court of Chancery to reinstate the pre-nuptial settlement. Both the London Consistory and Chancery
courts made initial rulings that were in her favour.
On Lady
Strathmore's ancestral estates in County Durham and Northumberland, the news of
her escape was welcomed. Some tenants
stopped co-operating with Bowes's agents and started paying their rents to
Mary. Hampers of food were sent to her
in London. However, with the countess s
whereabouts having become more widely known, Bowes was able to intimidate some
of her sympathisers into revealing where she was living. Intelligence of this development reached Mary
in time. She fled from her Dyers
Buildings residence before he arrived there.
Lady
Strathmore and her associates moved into a house on Bloomsbury Square. Her husband learnt of this. A watchman whom the household took into its
employment was already in his pay. The
adventurer then recruited a group of thugs from the North-East. On 10 November 1786 the gang abducted the
countess while she was travelling westwards along the easternmost section of
Oxford Street. News of what had happened
soon became the sensation of London.
Bowes
and his henchman took Mary up the Great North Road. All the while, he threatened her in order to
try to make her terminate her legal actions.
In her regained self-possession, and without an iota of doubt as to his
true character, she steadfastly refused to do so. The party arrived at Streatlam Castle, one of
the countess's ancestral homes in County Durham.
Their
presence there soon became common knowledge locally. Local miners, who were loyal to George
Bowes's daughter, laid siege to the building.
They lit bonfires around it so that there should be no possibility that
those who were within should be able escape under the cover of darkness. However, the fugitives and their captive had
departed during the confusion that had occurred while the cordon had been being
created around the Castle.
The
weather of the late autumn of 1786 was particularly awful. Much of northern England was subjected to
snowstorms. The Bowes party made a trek
through the remotest portions of the region.
Their lives were often at risk from the elements. In the meantime, descriptions of them were
circulated and innkeepers were told not to supply horses to anyone about whom
they had any doubts. It was only a
matter of time before the group would be identified. The adventurer was unable to break the
countess's spirit. On the 20th
the band passed through Neasham to the south of Darlington. A ploughman realised who they might be and
alerted the parish constable. Soon
afterwards an informal posse of villagers set out in pursuit of
them. Bowes and his group surrendered.
The
court proceedings that had been set in motion ground on slowly. The findings were all in the countess s
favour. However, the appellate nature of
the English legal system meant that Bowes was able to drag out the three
actions. This created the possibility
that one of them might fail which in turn might undermine the other two.
The
adventurer appeared before the Court of the King's Bench with regard to his
abduction of Mary. He was lodged in the
King's Bench Prison. However, this
involved no material hardship since his continuing control of his wife s
inheritance meant that he was able to rent a commodious house within the gaol s
precincts. In time, he raised 20,000,
paid his bail and regained his freedom.
When
Bowes and his gang were tried by the Court, they were found guilty upon every
charge. The adventurer was given a
three-year-long prison sentence. He
returned to his congenial quarters within the gaol. The verdict was an important step in the
advancement of the legal position of women in Britain. While it was accepted that men had extensive
rights over their wives, these had been ruled to be subject to the law.
A jury
in the Court of Common Pleas found unanimously that the deed that Bowes had
required Mary to sign was invalid because he had forced her to act under
duress. The Court of Chancery confirmed
this verdict. The adventurer lost
control of his wife's inheritance. He
was also ordered to pay costs. In March
1789 the Court of Delegates, which was the London Consistory Court's ultimate
appellate body, divorced the couple.
Bowes
still had control of Mary's two youngest children. Since her escape from the adventurer s
clutches Thomas Lyon had held a position of studied neutrality. However, he now became more co-operative
towards her. She was also aided by her
eldest son the 10th earl.
Upon his coming of age he had taken control of his father s
inheritance. The countess transferred
her own only recently reacquired one to him in return for a pension and
financial provision for her two youngest children. Bowes, perhaps appreciating that it was in
William's best material interests, surrendered his claims upon the boy and his
half-sister. The adventurer was to
remain in prison until he died.
Location:
The Adelphi Tavern, 1-4 John
Adam Street, WC2N 6EY (brown,
purple)
40
Bloomsbury Square, WC1B 4DA. (Formerly
No. 35.) (red, pink)
Fulham
F.C., Craven Cottage, Stevenage Road, SW6 6HH
2 Dyers
Buildings, EC1N 2JT (blue,
red)
48
Grosvenor Square, W1K 2HT (purple, grey)
King s
Bench Prison, 203 Borough High Street, SE1 1JA
St James s
Coffee House, 87 St James s
Street, SW1A 1PL (orange,
white)
Website:
http://beta.nationaltrust.org.uk/home/item248903 (Gibside Hall)
www.glamis-castle.co.uk
1. The playwright Samuel Foote knew Gray socially and may have used him
as one of the principal sources for The Nabob (1772), a comedy about the
social pretensions of returned, wealthy East India merchants.
2. Henry Liddell, a member of one of the Grand Allies families, had become
a member of the British peerage as Baron Ravensworth in 1747.
David
Backhouse 2024